Month: February 2020 (Page 2 of 2)

Reader’s Notebook, 2/10/20

While reading one of these books, I had a memory of a similar book I had read recently. I looked into my Books Read list and could not find a match. I went back to reading, but the memory stuck with me. Soon I was checking again, and then looking through my Reader’s Notebook entries for the past few months, but still could not find it. Sadly my library does not offer a history of books that I have checked out to reference.

So, it appears that I forgot to account for a book I read late last year. I can’t remember the title or author. I imagine I will at some point. It was a good book, too!

On to the books I do remember.


Atlas of Remote Islands: Fifty Islands I Have Never Set Foot On and Never Will – Judith Schalansky
I’ve read so many books over the years about traveling to remote islands. Yet I’ve never been to a truly remote or exotic island.

Same for Judith Schalansky. She began her fascination with far-flung islands when we was a child in East Germany. She loved pouring over her family’s atlas and studying the way political and geographic features changed the colors on each page’s map. Those islands scattered in the middle of the great seas were especially captivating to her.

Schalansky came of age in modern, unified Germany. With that came a freedom to travel that did not exist in the communist country of her birth. Even with her ability to cross borders, those pesky islands still called to her.

Here she offers one-page essays on 50 remote, sometimes uninhabited islands, along with maps of each that she has drawn.[1] Sometimes the stories are historical factoids, sometimes fictional musings. But they all address the isolation and mystery that are part of each island’s DNA.


The Institute – Stephen King
Yep, I’m back on my bullshit. Each time I say, “OK, I’m done with reading Stephen King’s books,” someone tells me that I should really read one of his latest. I’m glad I listened to those friends – and the 2019 Best Of lists that included this book – and tackled The Institute. It is one of King’s best works in many years; likely his best post-Dark Tower novel.

The book is centered on Luke Ellis, a 12-year-old mega-genius from Minnesota who is about to go off to MIT after absolutely acing the SATs. Despite being smarter than anyone he’s ever met, Luke is remarkably grounded and normal. But he also has moments when things around him move unexpectedly. A pizza plater, for example, that flies off the table and crashes onto the floor when he gets agitated.[2]

In the middle of the night Luke is kidnapped, his parents murdered, and he wakes up at The Institute, a facility tucked away in the wilds of Maine. In The Institute are other tweens and teens who have either telekinetic or telepathic powers. They undergo tests and, within a few weeks of their arrival, are sent to the Back Half of the institute, from which they never return. No questions the kids ask about the tests are ever answered. The children are often subjected to physical violence if they don’t follow the orders of the Institute’s workers.

Eventually Luke, with the help of a kindly employee, hatches a plan to escape and find help. His trek to safety ends in a big, violent, deadly gun battle. While he earns the freedom of his friends at the Institute, that freedom comes with a potentially massive price.

This has all the elements of King’s best work: children with special powers as the main characters, who are far more mature and caring than most of their adult counterparts. A truly evil villain, in this case the Institute itself along with its employees. Relatable, everyman heroes. And an ending that is mostly satisfying, but leaves just enough uncertainty to make you wonder if the resolution of the problem was worth it.

It’s amazing that King is still cranking out these wonderful stories.


The Need – Helen Phillips
This is a book that owes a lot to Stephen King. It is creepy, has links to a parallel world, yet is based on seemingly normal people.

Molly is a paleobotanist – she looks for fossils of ancient plant life – who is engaged in a dig near her home. In recent weeks a series of strange, man-made objects have turned up. A Coke bottle with the logo slightly different than what we are used to. A toy soldier with a monkey tail. And, most importantly, a Bible that reads exactly like the Bible Molly has read with one, huge exception: God is referred to as “She” rather than “He.”

Molly has also been hearing strange sounds since these objects appeared. She is sure she has heard footsteps in her house at night, but there are never signs of an intruder.

Until one evening, when her husband is out of the country and she is attempting to get her toddler and preschooler to bed, the sounds return and she finally discovers the person who has been sneaking around.

I won’t give away who the person is, because the reveal is a fascinating moment in the story. I will say that Molly is presented with a rather unique rival, someone who knows her every detail of her life, down to her basic thoughts. This encounter turns Molly’s life upside down in a moment when she is at her most vulnerable.

This is one of those books that makes you squirm often as you read it. It’s not necessarily scary, but it has so many moments that should really creep you out. While it is focused on how motherhood can tear a woman’s life apart, as a stay-at-home dad I connected with much of the emotional and mental strain that Molly felt. I think any parent – mom or dad, working or not – will find moments here they can connect with.

There is a vagueness to how Phillips ends the story that has caused problems for many readers. I’m fine with vague endings. Phillips’ did make me wonder what the truth of the novel was, though. Was this intruder from another world real, or a figment of Molly’s overstressed and hormonal imagination?


The Topeka School – Ben Lerner
I had quite the run recently. Four books I had on hold came in within a week of each other. I ended up having to send one back to tackle later, but I raced through the other three, including this, judged by many critics to be one of the best of 2019.

It confused me. And I’m not sure why. As I read it I wondered if I am just getting older, and am losing my ability to connect with what younger people think is interesting/relevant art. Or am I just not that smart and miss what all these highfalutin, east coast critics go gaga for?

That’s not to say I didn’t enjoy the book. I liked long stretches of it a lot. After a bit of a slow start I raced through most of it in two days.

But when I went back and read reviews to see what I was missing that made others think this was a work of genius, I did not understand how they reached their conclusions. Some said it is a grand statement on language and its meaning. I totally missed that. Others said it is a statement on toxic masculinity. I kind of get that, but it wasn’t my big takeaway from the book.

Maybe it’s just that I’ve always been most concerned with plot and character. There are plenty of books that I can find deeper, metaphorical meanings in. But that isn’t always my primary mission when looking to be entertained.

I liked the book. I liked that it (mostly) took place in Topeka and Lawrence and Kansas City in times when I lived in that area. I liked one character, Adam, in particular. I could draw many lines directly from his high school life to mine.

But whatever it is that made so many people go nuts for this book was either over my head, or just didn’t tickle the right parts of my brain.


  1. She is a graphic artist by training. She even created the typeface the book is printed in.  ↩
  2. I, and I bet most King fans, yelled “YES!” when King first revealed this unexplained power.  ↩

Friday Vid

“Rock With You” – Michael Jackson
Today was a late start day for CHS, and I have an appointment this morning, so no time for a full playlist.

Instead I share this wonderful video and a link to a new site fellow music junkies should absolutely bookmark.

Richard Challen is a music journalist who is a regular commentor on Tom Breihan’s The Number Ones series at Stereogum. Inspired by that series moving towards the 1980s – the latest entry was from June 1979 – Challen has started his own site, Spandex & Synths, where he will break down every song that charted in the 1980s. That’s right, every song. Not every #1 or every top ten track. Every. Song. If he survives long enough to do it, that is.

He has three entries up so far, and one is on Michael Jackson’s “Rock With You.” He captures all that is great about the track and what sets it apart from other MJ songs.

And then there is this video, which is 1000% tremendous.

Reaching for the Stars, Vol. 36

Well crap. When I posted RFTS Vol. 37 last week I did so not realizing I had yet to post Vol. 36. So they are out of order. I apologize for the error.

Chart Week: January 30, 1988
Songs: “Push It,” Salt-N-Pepa; “Pump Up the Volume,” M/A/R/R/S
Chart Positions: #26, 11th week on the chart. Peaked at #19 the week of February 20. #25, 10th week on the chart. Peaked at #13 for three weeks in February/March.

When did my musical tastes shift away from both AT40 and the music featured on the program? As with most changes in preference, there was no zero hour – or song zero in this case – when a switch flipped and my musical journey was sent in a dramatically different direction.

But if you had to pinpoint a moment when things began to shift, I think December 1986 would be as good of a moment as any. That was when I bought both RUN-DMC’s Raising Hell and the Beastie Boys’ Licensed to Ill AND we moved to California, where I discovered that white suburban kids weren’t listening to Van Halen, Bon Jovi, Huey Lewis, Boston, Hall & Oates, etc. but rather the Beasties, LL Cool J, and dozens of West Coast rap acts I had never heard of. I hung onto my classic pop radio sensibilities for a couple more years, but the first great shift took place in late 1986/early 1987.

It wasn’t just my tastes that were changing, though. The pop chart was changing, too. Where in the early-to-mid 1980s the Hot 100 was filled with New Wave, rock, and straight pop acts, in 1987 it began to shed those sounds and move in a more mellow direction. There were more adult contemporary and R&B influenced artists on the charts. As my likes were shifting more toward a youthful, cutting edge, hip hop direction, AT40 was skewing toward a softer sound aimed at aging Baby Boomers.

But there were two songs on the chart in early 1988 that showed I was onto something and that the charts would eventually catch up.

At #26 was Salt-N-Pepa’s infectious “Push It,” a song even people who hated rap loved. By early 1988 I was seriously into hip hop, and while I enjoyed “Push It,” I also dismissed it a bit. S-n-P was no Public Enemy, Too Short, or Ice-T. At the same time I realized the song was opening doors. There were girls dancing to it in the hallways and singing along to it in their cars. “Push It” could be the gateway track for those cuties to stop judging us affluent, suburban, white guys for listening to “Black” music. Not bad for a song that began as a B-side.

One spot higher was another pivotal track in the shifting musical landscape. M/A/R/R/S was a one-off collaboration between 4AD label mates Colourbox and A.R. Kane. Built upon no fewer than 30 samples – most notably Eric B. & Rakim’s legendary “I Know You Got Soul,” which gave this track its title – “Pump Up the Volume” became one of the first British House tracks to crack the charts in either the UK or US. It topped the pop charts in Britain, New Zealand, Holland, Italy, and Canada along with the US Dance chart. It opened the doors for a flood of House and House-derivative artists to dominate both clubs and radio through the early 1990s. “Pump Up the Volume” was the only single M/A/R/R/S ever released. It’s impact was extraordinary. I kept the cassette-single in my car for a long, long time.

Were these the songs that shifted the top 40 for good? Certainly not. The charts went several interesting and odd ways in the 1990s before hip hop finally took over in the early 2000s. But these two songs were distant, early warnings of changes to come.

Super Sunday and Monday

What a couple of days! We had back-to-back record high temperatures here in Indy. Sunday was the overtly nicer of the two: the sun was out and it felt like spring. Monday was actually four or five degrees warmer, but other than a quick peak of sun mid-morning, it was a very cloudy day and didn’t seem as warm as it actually was. Alas, in the hour since I dropped the girls at school we’ve dropped from 60 to 45 with another 10 or so degrees expected to bleed away by late afternoon.

Sunday we did some work around and outside the house.

But Monday was wide open so I got out and played golf for the first time since mid-November. I figured the course would fill up quickly so I got over as soon as I could after M’s late start. I teed off right around 9:20 with only a couple people in front of me. It was still cool, in the low 40s, but I didn’t need a hat or a glove on my bare hand. Getting there early was a wise choice. By the time I stepped to the fourth tee, which runs back toward the clubhouse, there were already several foursomes stacked up.

So, how’d I play? Not bad considering I didn’t warm up and played the first three holes way too fast to get some space between the guys who teed off shortly after me. I hit two off the first tee that were absolute garbage. But by the third tee I had loosened up and spent most of the day hitting the driver fairly straight. Same on the greens: after a slow start I had five one-putt holes, including three in a row on the back nine.

The issue yesterday was my irons. I hit a handful of decent shots but spent most of the day either spraying them or making horrible contact. Granted, the turf was in rough shape, as you would expect this time of year. Still, I was disappointed with my consistency there. My approach game was actually pretty solid, so it was all the second/third shots that were killing me.

I shot 44 on the front, 43 on the back, for my second 87. As seems to always happen on this course, I killed myself on one of the last two holes. On 17 I hit my second shot into the little creek that is about 40 yards short of the green. After the drop and penalty shot, I put myself in a really tough spot on the most difficult green on the course and four-putted to card an 8. Blech. I guess under the new handicapping rules I could have stopped counting at 6, but I figured I wasn’t in a match, no one was pushing me from the tee, and I legitimately made a mess of the hole: I deserved an 8 so I was recording an 8.

Still, not bad for a cool day in February when I hadn’t played in over three months. The round also allowed me to start thinking of concrete goals for this year. I think the biggest one is clear: get consistent with irons. If I can learn how to both stay closer to my target and get a better idea of how far I will hit them, I can see myself getting close to 80 on a regular basis.

OK, enough of that. On to the Super Bowl.


That was a damn fine game. I’m very happy for all my Kansas City friends. Several people asked me, “So I know you’re not a Chiefs fan, but are you pulling for them anyway?” My answer was always, “No.” I’m not that dude.

But neither was I pulling hard for the 49ers. I was leaning their way ever-so-slightly, but mostly I was looking for an entertaining game.[1] Which we certainly got.

I thought going in that the Chiefs were just too difficult to contain and no matter how good the Niners defense was, eventually they would crack. Plus I couldn’t see the SF offense putting enough points up to give their defense enough of a cushion to work with.

Hey, that’s pretty much exactly what happened! Not bad for a guy who doesn’t watch much of the NFL anymore!

Since someone always has to be the goat, there’s been plenty of hate aimed toward Kyle Shanahan and Jimmy Garappolo. I don’t see anything egregious either did to cause the loss, though. I tend to fall into the camp of thinking it kind of remarkable that the Niners came so close to winning a Super Bowl with a QB as limited as Garappolo. He can get the ball downfield, but still he’s just a slightly upgraded Alex Smith. A good enough NFL quarterback, but not one who is going to be a game changer.

And the big problem for San Fransisco, of course, was that on the other sideline was the biggest game changer in the game. Unless you get to the point where the Chiefs needed to recover multiple onside kicks to have a chance, the game was never really over. I figured the Chiefs would still win until that math came into effect, no matter how far down they were.

So, again, pleased for all my friends and family back in KC who are still celebrating. But not happy for the team itself not finding any personal joy in their win.


I have had conversations with several Big 12 basketball fans about how college basketball referees are calling the game this year. To sum it up: I really don’t know what a foul is anymore. I see defenders reach out and grab offensive players as they drive, or body them up and knock them off their path, yet no foul is called. I thought there was that big move a couple years back to reestablish the offense’s right to freedom of movement but in game-after-game I see the defense doing things that would be a foul in just about every other level of basketball go uncalled.

I mention that because it sure seems like NFL refs have eased up in their protection of the quarterbacks. I saw Patrick Mahomes get hit in the helmet or face mask at least three times, never with a call. On their final possession when they still had the lead, Garappolo suffered an obvious helmet-to-helmet hit that left him noticeably dazed, again no call.

The whole protecting the quarterback thing is tough. It’s hard to find the right point between giving the most expensive player on the field some aid and still keeping it tackle football. The ebb-and-flow between those concerns changes every season.

I thought it was strange that we seemed to revert to rules from several years ago just in time for the Super Bowl.


Commercials? The Bill Murray Jeep one was clearly the best. I was a fan of the Hyundai Smart Park ad, but apparently not everyone agreed. I guess not everyone loves a good, over-the-top Boston accent. The Google ad that made people cry annoyed me. Disappointed Chris Rock is shilling for Facebook. Not surprised that Sylvester Stallone is doing the same. The whole Mr. Peanut thing is dumb and was painfully predictable.


I didn’t watch the halftime show. I hear some folks were offended that there was some ass shaking. Shocking.

Feels like there needs to be a big push to get Pearl Jam or Foo Fighters on stage soon. But with dancers and stripper poles so people can still fan themselves and claim to be horrified they were forced to watch.


  1. I could have really confused people by saying, “I’m a big Niners fan. I lived out there for 11 months when I was in high school.” In fact, I’m disappointed I didn’t say that even though I’m not a Niners fan at all.  ↩

Stats

January 2020

  • Matt Mays – 36
  • The Beatles – 34
  • Prince – 27
  • Young Guv – 26
  • Julia Jacklin – 24
  • Neil Finn – 23

Complete stats available at my Last.fm page

Newer posts »

© 2024 D's Notebook

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑