“Under A Rock” – Waxahatchee
Two weeks after Courtney Barnett dropped the first great album of the year, Katie Crutchfield drops one that is almost as good. I’ve been a fan of Crutchfield since Waxahatchee’s last album, and I love her mash-up of mid–90s college rock with a healthy dose of the more recent indie sound. Say a mid-point between bands like Throwing Muses and Belly from back in the day, and Barnett, Cat Power, and Sharon Van Etten.
Month: April 2015 (Page 2 of 2)
Allow me to admit something that may seem obvious to other parents out there, but which surprised me and may make you laugh at / mock me.
As I’ve mentioned many times over the years, child care has never been an issue for us. S. comes from a large family, many of whom have lived near us, and thus we’ve pretty much always had access to free-to-cheap and readily available sitters on the rare occasions when we actually go out and engage in adult social activities. Grandparents, aunts, uncles, and even “honorary” aunts – friends of their blood relatives that the girls already knew and were comfortable with – have always been there for us.
There have been exactly two exceptions in 10 years.[1]
Once, when visiting friends in Michigan about two months before C. was born we had a sitter come over to watch M. and our hosts’ kids. But we made sure M. was in bed and asleep before we left, at the expense of showing up late for our dinner reservation. She never saw the sitter.
Then, last spring, when we were headed out for an evening with our neighbors, we collectively hired the college freshman from two houses down to watch our five girls. She walked over when it was time for us to leave, and walked home after we returned. Even though the girls didn’t really know her, they had seen her around for years and were excited to hang out with someone new. Easy.
Our girls actually look forward to nights when we go out, knowing an aunt or Mimi and Ampa are coming over to spend the evening with them.
We may, though, have entered a brave new world.
Last month we actually had an eighth grader from St. P’s come over and watch the girls for a few hours so we could go to happy hour/dinner with some other St. P’s parents.
When we told the girls that A. was coming over to watch them, they freaked out. In a good way. They were crazy excited. L. knew A. a little, as her eighth-grade buddy is best friends with A, and A’s kindergarten buddy is one of L.’s best friends. And A’s mom is a part-time teacher at St. P’s, so M. and C. knew who she was.
Anyway, we picked A. up, brought her over, I had a list of all pertinent information on the counter for her, pizza was set to be delivered shortly, and the girls had a stack of games and movies they couldn’t wait to share with her. Off we went.
We had a great evening; good food, good beer, good company. I checked in with A. via text a couple times and it sounded like the girls were having fun, too. A’s mom was with our group, and she showed me texts that confirmed all was going well. I think she was as excited because A. just began babysitting and she was glad she was starting with an easy group of kids.
At one point in the evening, another dad in our group asked a very important question.
“Who is driving A. home?”
“Umm, me,” I said, not having really thought of it.
He laughed and shook his head, “No, no, no, no!”
This is probably old news to the other dads out there who have used sitters who can’t drive before, but I was truly shocked to find out that dads are not supposed to drive babysitters home anymore. Or at least not without someone else in the car. By this point in the evening, it was a requirement that I drive rather than S., so we couldn’t make that adjustment in plans for who got A. home.
Fortunately we got around it. A’s mom had caught a ride to dinner, expecting her husband to join us later. He couldn’t make it, so we offered her a ride home. Whew, I wasn’t going to be alone in a car with a 13-year-old girl!
This whole thing bugged me, though. I mean, logically it made sense. But as a kid, it always seemed like it was the dad who drove my friends’ sitters home. I asked our neighbors what their rules were. They quickly agreed that dad never drives a sitter home alone. In fact, they said, their weekly church group even devoted a whole session to exactly that topic: making sure you don’t put yourself or a kid in a situation that could become inappropriate.
When I shared this with S., I was kind of fascinated by our reactions. She thought it was crazy and kind of stupid. I, on the other hand, after thinking about it more, thought about how many teenage girls have been driven home by semi- to completely drunk dads over the years. Even if nothing is attempted, said, or hinted at, the chances for the situation to quickly get creepy are pretty high. Kind of interesting that the woman thought these guidelines are weird and the dad thought they were reasonable.
So we’ve adjusted our plan for the next time we have A. over, or any other sitter over who needs a ride home at the end of the night. S. will drive them home. Or, if it’s not too late, one or more of the girls will ride with me if I’m the driver.
Anyway, I thought some of you might laugh at how our sheltered parenting experience means we’re just now figuring out some things that others of you discovered many years ago.
As a postscript, I should share that the girls indeed had a great time. They are all excited any time they see A. in the halls or in the parking lot at pickup and tell me all about it. At C.’s softball practice last week, M. and L. went to the restrooms. When they came back they were screaming, “Dad! We saw A. practicing soccer!” They keep asking when we’re going to have her over again.
I think we chose pretty wisely when we decided to finally bite the bullet and get someone who isn’t an adult relative, or near-relative, to watch the girls for us. Thank goodness our girls didn’t act like the lunatics they are around us for their new friend.
I think there have been a few times when the girls have hung with someone else’s grandmother for awhile. But I don’t really count that as hiring a sitter. ↩
On balance, it was a pretty solid Final Four for those of us who had no true allegiance to any of the schools represented.
Yes, it sucks that Duke and Coach K won their fifth title last night. Especially given a couple awfully suspicious calls that went their way late. It wasn’t as bad as the ’01 Final Four game against Maryland, when pretty much every non-Duke fan watching believed that all three referees were doing all they could to help Duke win. And Wisconsin got a kind whistle in the first half.
But, for as annoying as Duke winning is, it was still better than Kentucky winning two more games to finish 40–0.
For several years I’ve tried not to hate as much as I used to in sports. That’s a big reason I don’t watch as many games as I used to. If I don’t like a team playing, and there’s no real benefit for my team in the outcome, I will often skip a game just to keep my hate levels low.
That all went out the window Saturday. I was pulling hard for Wisconsin to win. I can’t think of a time in my adult life when I pulled as hard for a college basketball team that did not have Kansas across their chests. I was yelling and whooping and throwing the occasional pillow during what ended up being an absolutely fantastic game. When the Badgers went on that late run and the Wildcats slowly wilted, I loved every second of it. For one night, just about all of the college basketball universe came together to help the Badgers overcome the juggernaut that was this year’s Kentucky team. And it worked!
To celebrate I ran upstairs, helped finish and hide the Easter baskets, and then downed about five handfuls of various left-over candies. Not the smartest thing, given how my stomach felt the next morning.
I was pulling hard for Wisconsin again last night, and was loving how the game looked halfway through the second half. But Coach K did his voodoo, Wisconsin’s offense fell apart, and Grayson Allen and Tyus Jones hit some massive shots to deny us the perfect ending.
Sorry, Bucky. Thanks for your efforts. We’ll always have Indy!
Some notes from the Final Four:
- Yes, this season was absolutely a disappointment for Kentucky. But only because they made 40–0 a clear goal for this team, not because of our out-of-whack expectations and the over-emphasis on what happens in the tournament vs. the rest of the season. They set themselves up. They have to live with the fallout. And Calipari will tell us the season was a massive success when he has four, five, maybe even six more first round picks this June. Because he’s said he measures the programs success based on how many kids are drafted, not how many games they win.
- I love to hate on Cal. Especially since he was thoroughly out-coached Saturday. But I’ll give him this: he gets his crazy system to work. Trey Lyles could have gone to Indiana, averaged 25 points a game, and made a case for being the #1 pick. Instead he went to UK, had a nice season, and will be picked in the 10–20 range. Devon Booker could have followed his dad’s path to Missouri, or stayed home at one of the Mississippi schools and been a huge star. Karl-Anthony Towns could have looked at the Kentucky roster and thought, “Man, I’m going somewhere where I play 35 minutes a night and the ball comes to me on every possession.” And on and on. Calipari gets the kids to sacrifice for the greater good, a decidedly old-school truth about his teams. Hate him, celebrate when he loses, and wish the system was different and didn’t allow what he does to happen. But you have to give him credit for making it work.
- Speaking of sacrificing, prepare yourselves for two months of noise about how the Harrison twins sacrificed so much so Kentucky could be great the last two years, how “humble and grounded” they are, and how they are really much better players than they’ve shown in college. Because they can’t come back for a third year, right? And with neither currently listed in the first round of most mock drafts, Cal and the other folks around the twins are going to have to do some serious spinning to help their cause. Or the kids might just go out and destroy everyone at pre-draft workouts and make those arguments themselves.
- Is Coach K the greatest coach in college basketball history? Likely so. The era John Wooden won his titles in was completely, dramatically different than the one K has won his in. You just can’t argue with five titles in a quarter century, or the seven more Final Four appearances on top of that. Yes, he’s had some bad first weekend losses. John Wooden never had to play in a tournament like the modern one. If he did, he’d likely have some duds, too. I think the only knock against K is that he’s not a great innovator. He hasn’t fundamentally changed the game like Dean Smith did. Or Adolph Rupp. Or Hank Iba. Or Phog Allen. But I think that’s a pretty small quibble. He may not have developed a new offense that everyone else was playing two years later, or changed how coaches run defense. But he’s still set the standard for how you run a program. And the way he’s always adjusted his sets to match his teams biggest strengths has been brilliant. Each Duke team plays a little differently. A lot of great coaches would force their kids to adapt to their system rather than adjust to their talents.
- Duke still sucks. And it will be fun to hate Grayson Allen, who was clearly born to be That Guy at Duke. The athletic, cocky white kid who hits huge shots and then celebrates for all to see. Frankly I think the NCAA would have stepped in and forced the kid to go to Duke had he decided to stay in-state and go to Florida, FSU, or Miami.
- As cool as it is to have the Final Four here in Indy on a regular basis, I’m kind of ready for the NCAA to decide to skip us for a decade or so. Duke has now won three of its titles here in Naptown.[1] Although KU was in the 1991 Final Four here, the last three times Indy has hosted, KU has lost to a Missouri Valley team the first weekend of the tournament. So go ahead and mark your calendars for 2021. Duke will win the title and KU is losing to Evansville in the round of 32.
- Two others came in Minneapolis. No more -apolis cities! ↩
As promised, a whole mess of baseball links in honor of Opening Day.
Let’s go to the oldest piece first. The Deadspin Stacks reprinted Robert Ward’s legendary article about Reggie Jackson published in Sport[1] magazine in 1977. It, in many ways, defined how Reggie was perceived for the rest of his career. Not unfairly, I should add. Be sure to read the epilogue Ward added for the reprint.
The Day A Shit-Talking Reggie Jackson Tore Apart The Yankees
Daniel Norris could not be more different than Reggie Jackson. Forget about Reggie, he’s in dramatic opposition to the bulk of young guys who have big fat contracts and limitless futures. The Blue Jays rookie spent spring training living in an old Volkswagen camper he parked in a Wal-Mart parking lot. And that’s just the beginning of his unorthodox way of living life.
Joe Posnanski with a pretty great profile of Bobby Bragan, a man who moved past history and prejudice to embrace Jackie Robinson when he broke the color line.
C. is playing softball this year. A few weeks back we bought her a bat, tee, and glove. Since my glove disappeared sometime in the past 20 years, I also bought the third baseball glove of my life. I just got a cheap, discontinued Rawlings model on Amazon. I figured I’m just going to be playing catch with the girls, or fielding their hits, so there was no need to spend a ton of money.
This article appeared at the perfect time, as I’ve been going through all the rituals of breaking my mitt in. Like so much about baseball, the simple act of making leather supple can take on spiritual elements.
To Break In Their Gloves, Yankees Dunk, Tenderize and Lather Up
Speaking of baseball ritual, here is yet another nice accounting of how baseball helped bridge the gap between father and son.
Saying ‘I Love You’ With Baseball
Ten baseball books every fan should read. Sadly I’ve read seven, which means there isn’t much new here for me.
An interesting history of how baseball caps became the most common headwear for men off the diamond.
Finally, Will Leitch’s 125 predictions for the season.
- I loved Sport magazine. And Inside Sports. I often wasted a library pick on the current issue of one or the other back in 4th and 5th grades. Even though I usually had them read, front-to-back, before the school day was over. ↩
Today, we wake up. Baseball begins again in Kansas City, which means we stop dreaming about the unbelievable run of last October, wondering if Alex Gordon could have scored or waking from nightmares about Madison Bumgarner.
Now, all of that is truly part of the past. We have new games to watch!
Which is kind of a shame. Because I just don’t think last year was the beginning of some great run for the Royals.
Maybe Eric Hosmer is ready to play MVP-caliber ball for six months.
Maybe Mike Moustakas figured something out last fall and can finally turn into a guy who can hit 25–30 home runs a year and get on base about 30 percent of the time.
Perhaps last year was not an aberration at the plate for both Lorenzo Cain and Alcides Escobar and they can both repeat their ’14 numbers. Maybe Yordano Ventura is ready to be a big league #1 for 200+ innings.
Maybe Danny Duffy is ready to be a big league #2 for 200+ innings.
Maybe Edinson Volquez, Jason Vargas, and Jeremy Guthrie can continue to fool batters.
Maybe Herrera-Davis-Holland will repeat as the most deadly bullpen trio in MLB history. Maybe Salvador Perez can stay healthy.
Maybe every string that Ned Yost pulls will continue to be the right string. Or when he pulls the wrong string, it somehow works out like it did in October.
Here’s the problem, though. It will take all of that to happen, and probably more, to compete in what should be a much tougher AL Central this year, or fight what should be a deeper pool of teams for a Wild Card slot this year. I can see two, three, maybe four of those things happening. But not all of them.
Still, I’m picking with my heart rather than my brain. I say the Royals win 83, 84 games and finish just on the fringe of both the division and Wild Card races.
My brain says a third-straight season with 81+ wins is going to be tough, though.
But it’s Opening Day! The grass is greening up. There will be baseball on the TV, radio, and our i-devices for the next seven months. And the Royals, for today at least, are no longer a laughingstock and we can dream that all the magic of last October will continue into this season.
Worth noting, I’ll be celebrating Opening Day by covering a high school softball game the begins at roughly the same time the Royals game starts. Would it be wrong for me to show up about three hours early with a grill and a cooler and look for someone to play catch with?
The two leagues have very different feels. In the American League, there does not seem to be a dominant team, and in each division there are at least two completely reasonable choices for a champ. Then, when the playoffs roll around, there will be a bunch of evenly matched, but flawed teams, battling for the pennant.
In the National League, however, there seem to be clear leaders in each division, with two of those poised to put up monster years if they can stay healthy.
So, here come the patented, half-assed, likely totally wrong predictions.
AL East: Red Sox
Every preview I read throws out the theory that the Red Sox roster will look very different in August. Cole Hamels, come on down? I suppose I’ll but into that idea as well. Toronto will hold the lead at the All-Star Break, but the Sox get hot late to nudge out the Blue Jays.
AL Central: White Sox
I could talk myself into any of three teams here. The White Sox seem too young, and too recently put together. But I love most of the moves they made in the off season. I think the Indians have a real shot to win, but I also think they have the least room for error, and will likely slip up or suffer a major injury or two that wrecks their chances. The Tigers will look great on the nights when everything clicks, but are too old and fragile to continue their dominance of the division.
AL West: Athletics
Say what you want about Billy Beane, but he always keeps it interesting. He made some huge moves last year to build a team that would finally win him a pennant, only to cough up a huge division lead and then blow two late leads in the Wild Card game. So he completely blew the team up again. And, somehow, they’re going to be really, really good again.
Wildcards: Blue Jays, Mariners
Not sure I buy all the Mariners hype, and it was hard for me to pick them over Cleveland. But I bet they stay healthier than the Indians. And they have the luxury of playing the Rangers and Astros often.
Playoffs
Mariners over Blue Jays. King Felix is dominant.
Mariners over Athletics. Starting pitching is the difference. And Billy Beane’s shit still doesn’t work in the playoffs.
Red Sox over White Sox. One last hurrah for Papi and Pedroia.
Red Sox over Mariners. Hamels out-duels Felix in an epic game seven.
NL East: Nationals
Potential juggernaut No. 1.
NL Central: Cardinals
Will survive the toughest division in the majors.
NL West: Dodgers
Potential juggernaut No. 2.
Wildcards: Pirates, Mets
Playoffs
Mets over Pirates. Matt Harvey breaks Pittsburgh’s heart again.
Nationals over Mets. Harvey not enough.
Dodgers over Cardinals. Kershaw’s shit works this year.
Nationals over Dodgers. Bryce Harper in the MVP in an epic series.
World Series: Nationals over Red Sox
The team of the ‘00s falls to the team poised to become the team of the next decade.
My girls go to school approximately 11 miles away from Lucas Oil Stadium. When I picked them up about an hour ago,[1] that is the closest I’ll get to downtown Indy this weekend.
I’ve already dealt with a downtown swarming with Kentucky fans once this year. No need to do it again when A) there are going to be approximately 8 million of them clogging the streets this time and B) their team is on the verge of history. They were insufferable back in November.[2] I can’t imagine what they’ll be like this weekend.
Nope, I’ll stay up here in the northern suburbs practicing spring sports with the girls.
It’s not just Kentucky, though. We’re on the verge of a nightmare scenario national championship game for most of the college basketball world. Who do you root for if there is a Duke-Kentucky final and you are not a fan of either school? These are the bluest of the blue bloods over the past 25 years. They are, likely, the two most loathed programs in the game. How do you pick when it’s Evil Empire 1 vs. Evil Empire 2?
I suppose the right answer is that you hope that matchup does not happen. Maybe Michigan State can spin their Tom Izzo magic one more game and knock off Duke. And might Wisconsin have the perfect combination of size, experience, offense, and smarts to hang with the Wildcats for 38 minutes and then make the winning plays that Notre Dame could not make in last week’s regional final?
Sure, both are possible. Anything is possible in the NCAA tournament. This is an event that routinely does not end up with the best team winning the championship.
But I won’t be holding my breath for two upsets, let alone one Saturday.
So it’s going to be the ultimate college basketball brand, Kentucky, where John Calipari sells his program as the finest stepping stone to the NBA, versus the most corporate program in the game, Duke, where when Coach K isn’t expertly adjusting his offense to best suit the talent he has in a given year, he’s thinking of how he can leverage that success into another round of speeches and books aimed at business leaders.
I can’t bring myself to root for Duke as the final chance to prevent Kentucky from going undefeated. But neither can I want anything good to happen to UK and Calipari.
So I’m going to root like hell for Wisconsin tomorrow, and then I’ll spend most of Monday night watching baseball. But I’m sure I’ll be checking in on what’s going on downtown regularly.
- Early dismissal for Good Friday, then no school on Monday. The joys of Catholic schools! ↩
- As a reminder a Kentucky fan a couple rows behind us told the 9-year-old Duke fan directly behind us to pay attention, because this was the best team he would ever see. And this was in the first 10 minutes when KU was still in the game. TO A 9-YEAR-OLD! ↩
Not one, not two, but three videos this week!
The first two were ones I meant to share before we took off on spring break two weeks ago. Alas, that final Thursday was entirely too busy and I wasn’t able to queue them up. The first one seems appropriate for the Final Four weekend.
“Dunked On” – Froggy Fresh & Money Maker Mike
Here is a classic example of what my friends and I could have done if we had the technology about 25–30 years ago. This is exactly how things used to go down in the Nesbitts’ driveway back in the day.
https://youtu.be/KXOFVTO7tGE
“Transmission” – Mario Paint Composer
Another silly one. The Corner Of Cool Stuff apparently spends hours recreating classic songs in the Mario Paint Composer program app. This version of the legendary, and significantly underrated, Joy Division song is spectacular.
“Depreston” – Courtney Barnett
Finally! The first great album of 2015 came out a week ago, and it was worth every second of waiting. She delivers on all the tremendous expectations that have built up for her full-length debut over the past two years. It is a resounding confirmation of all the promise she’s showed in her early EPs. Barnett she is one of the brightest young voices in rock music.
When I first heard this song, the second single from the album, I was not all that impressed. But after repeated listens, it wormed its way into my head and I’m thoroughly in love with it now. As always, it takes a few listens to fully digest her lyrics, but once you do, their brilliance is obvious. And I love the music she lays the words upon. She rocks on much of the album, but this wistful sound, where she addresses the concerns of leaving her youth behind and entering adulthood, is where she is at her best.
Three months into the year, 15 books completed. My meager math skills tell me that puts me on pace for 60 books this year. I imagine that pace will slow a bit.
March was a bit of a mixed bag. A couple books I really enjoyed. A couple duds. And one re-read from way back.
The Flamethrowers – Rachel Kushner
This book was, perhaps, a little too artsy for me. It tells the story of ‘Reno’, a young artist from Reno, NV who gets sucked into the artistic world of New York in the mid–1970s via her Italian boyfriend. Eventually she lands in Italy on his family’s compound, and finds herself in the midst of broad protests by workers and leftist intellectuals against the power of big business and the government.
It’s a little wacky. And I can’t say that the story kept my attention as it zigged and zagged.
The Age Of Lincoln – Orville Burton
I heard Burton on NPR on the anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s second inaugural address, a speech Burton believes to be one of the finest in American political history. I loved listening to him expound on the brilliance of Lincoln, especially since Burton, based on his accent, is from the American South. At the next red light, I quickly wrote down his name and searched for his writings when I got home.
This book is not a biography of Lincoln, nor a history of the Civil War. Rather, it is a brisk look at the United States in the 20–30 years before the War, during the War years, and in the years of the reconstruction. He highlights the issues that were soon to divide the country, the big battles and challenges of the war years, and how the South rebuilt not just its physical world, but also its culture after the War.
It’s a fantastic book. He writes lovely prose, and is clearly passionate about the era in general and his thesis in particular. He argues that Lincoln brought about a fundamental change in American society, where personal freedom was guaranteed by the constitution and government. From that profound adjustment of the meaning of freedom, not only were the slaves freed, but voting rights were dramatically expanded to, within 60 years, include nearly all adults in the US.[1]
For years I’ve wanted to read a good Civil War history but have often been daunted by the sheer size of so many of the best ones. This was far from exhaustive, but it was a fine way to get a reminder about an era I really had not studied much since the spring semester of my fifth grade year.
The Hunt For Red October – Tom Clancy
When Clancy died last year, I wondered if I should revisit one of his books. I was a faithful reader of his Jack Ryan books for a solid 5–6 year stretch, until I grew tired of his often ponderous prose and less interested in where the series was going.
But, between watching The Americans and the 30 for 30 about the 1980 Soviet Olympic hockey team, it seemed like the perfect moment to jump back and read his first book, which fit in nicely to that 1980s, US-USSR Cold War vibe.
I believe I read this book twice – perhaps three times – in high school, the first time coming in the fall of 1986. But I saw the movie many, many times after that. So it was funny to re-read the book and realize my memory of it was seriously clouded by the movie. I kept expecting a couple scenes that never came about. I forgot about twists in the book that were cut from the screenplay. It’s funny how memory works sometimes.
And while I enjoyed racing through this again, the entire time I was reading I was thinking about the 15-year-old kid who read it for the first time 29 years ago. Man, I loved it then. Jonesy, the sonar operator extraordinaire on the U.S.S. Dallas, appealed to my interest in sleuthing via monitoring electronic signals. I think, for a week or two, I might have even thought that it would be an awesome job to be a sonar operator on a nuclear submarine. Thank goodness that interest passed!
Fourth Of July Creek – Smith Henderson
This book made me angry. Not because it was bad. No, it was a freaking fantastic book.
What made me mad was this was Henderson’s debut novel. And it’s nearly perfect. Engaging, emotional, joyous, and heart-breaking. Evocative of a specific moment in American history, one that resounded with me strongly. Centered on a tortured yet heroic main character. With some nice themes of the paradoxes of modern American society. It has it all.
Quickly, Pete Snow is a social worker in Montana in the early 1980s. As he attempts to help families who are in the clutches of addiction and economic collapse, his family is also falling apart. While he works tirelessly to help his clients, he often chooses to let his own home drama spiral deeper into disaster without attempting to fix it. A mysterious child who shows up at a school one day eventually pulls him into an anti-government movement that is growing in the wilderness. Despite Snow’s best efforts, just about everything ends up badly.
This is, by far, the best book I’ve read so far this year. Everything else will have a difficult time challenging it.
Black Moon – Kenneth Calhoun
The second disappointing book of the month. I swear this was on several Best Of lists last year, but after reading it I was mis-remembering.
In the story, an unexplained epidemic of insomnia is sweeping the nation. Most Americans are unable to sleep, and after a week or more of being awake, turn into shuffling zombies that only show signs of life when they come across someone who can still sleep. Then they turn into shrieking, raging lunatics bent on tearing the “sleepers” to shreds.
The book follows a few people from each side. A couple “sleepers,” a couple people who are slower than others to catch the illness, and one who works at the sleep research lab that seemed to create and release the plague and is frantically searching for a cure or fix. They each travel in search of family, friends, and loved ones hoping that they can find and save them before it is too late.
There’s a lot of wandering in the book. But, unlike a Stephen King story, or other semi-apocalyptic books I’ve read, here the wandering seems aimless. I never felt like a cure or explanation for what was happening was just a chapter away. Things just seem to get a little worse as the story unfolds. And the end, to me at least, was thoroughly dissatisfying.
- Of course those rights were not protected for all Americans, specifically African Americans in the South, until the mid 1960s. ↩