Month: March 2017 (Page 2 of 2)

Friday Playlist

“Darling” – WOMPS. Some fine, Frightened Rabbit-approved Scottish rock.
“Sentimental and Monday” – Holy Holy. Apparently this song has been around for a couple years, but I just found it thanks to one of my Spotify Discovery playlists. It’s cold, rainy, and bleak in Indy today. This song is perfect for this morning.
“Why We Fight” – Fast Romantics. There’s something about the Canadian national identity that makes them prone to forming musical collectives. Here’s a new one, with a big, bright sound.
“Sway” – School ’94. Not sure why they picked that name. With this sound, School ’84 would have been far more appropriate.

“If I Should Fall From Grace With God” – The Pogues. Happy St. Patrick’s Day from the sexiest man in rock, Shane MacGowan.

Tourney Notes, Day 2

Hate to admit it, but I did not pay as much attention to day two of the tournament. Once again, I had the games on for roughly three-quarters of the evening. But this time instead of missing the first half of the first game, I skipped the second half of the second game because I was tired and knew the next few days would be long. That seemed like the smart choice with Providence pounding USC at halftime.

Still, I was not entirely surprised when I woke this morning to a couple texts about Providence’s collapse and checked the score the see that USC had closed it out and advanced.

And, despite the winner of the NC Central – UC Davis game being KU’s opponent Friday, I kind of casually watched that game. It was entertaining. Both teams played hard. But, man, were there a lot of airballs, out-of-control drives that ended in turnovers, and general sloppy play. Sometimes teams are 16-seeds for a reason, I guess.

The highlight of the night was helping L fill out her first ever bracket. She told us, while watching the early game, that she didn’t understand what brackets were. So I printed one out and sent her to grab it from the office. When she returned, she shook her head and said, “Yeah, I have no idea what this means.”

So she sat down and I walked her through the basics: 64 teams are divided into four, 16-team regions and the teams are seeded 1–16 based on their regular seasons. You pick winners in the first 32 games, then the second 16 games, and so on. It still didn’t make a ton of sense to her, so I just read off each matchup: “Butler #4 vs. Winthrop #13,” and she made her choice.

She has a few wacky picks, as you might expect. She has Arkansas beating North Carolina, and Northwestern beating Gonzaga. Her Final Four is Baylor, Florida State, Butler, and KU. That seems like the Final Four an eight-year-old who rarely watches college hoops would pick.

She has KU winning it all, so this may be the March she gets to learn about the searing pain that is coming up short in the NCAA tournament. Or, more likely, I’ll be pouting around the house for a few days and she’ll move on with her life like a normal human being.


I’m already getting tired of the Charles Barkley, Samuel L. Jackson, Spike Lee commercials. I imagine there will be a long list of others before the month is done.


I locked in my picks this morning. Each year is a struggle between picking with the heart or emphatically against the heart. I decided to say “Eff it” and went with the heart this year.

Final Four: KU, UNC, Villanova, Arizona, KU beating Villanova in the final.

Despite that, current KU mood: Several times a year I have dreams about basketball. And they’re always frustrating. One I remember from last fall had KU just destroying Kentucky in the first half of the national championship game. And then someone called me and said they had an extra ticket, get down to the arena for the second half. Then the dream did one of those early morning things where you get stuck in a loop and can’t advance it: it took me forever to find my shoes, my car keys, then I had to do something else, etc. etc. etc. and my dream never revealed what happened in the second half. Garbage.

Anyway, lately I’ve been having a series of dreams about the world ending. Like literally. The night after KU lost to Iowa State in early February, I had a dream where a bunch of people and I were walking through the deserted countryside, looking for a big cliff, and then we stared at the sky, waiting for something to come that would signal the end of the world, and we would then leap to our deaths. No idea whether it was an asteroid, Russian missiles, or what.

I’ve had two other dreams about civilization as we know it ending in the past couple weeks. Maybe it’s Trump and his nonsense, maybe it’s just normal mid-life fears about the shortness of life. Or maybe it’s basketball that’s making me have these dreams. And the end of life is a metaphor for KU losing to some shitty team they have no business losing to. That’s totally possible, right? The meaning of the dream, I mean.

Anyway, I’ll be happy when 7:00 pm tomorrow rolls around and KU gets on the court and I can focus my stress a little more. It will be nice to (knock on wood) go to bed Friday evening stressing about Miami or Michigan State rather than the broader, non-specific stress I’m feeling now.

Honestly, sports are terrible.

Tourney Notes, Day 1

I got to watch three-quarters of the first night of the tournament last night. A few quick thoughts.


The Mt. St. Mary’s – New Orleans game was fun. A couple teams flat going at each other for 40 minutes. New Orleans got some local run because their head coach and one assistant coach are from Bloomington. I thought head coach Mark Slessinger blew it by playing the last defensive possession of the game straight-up. That was a classic “go for the steal for the first 10–15 seconds then foul” situation. When you trail you have to give your team a chance to have a decent possession to close the game. He didn’t give his team that opportunity. But I’ve won a grand total of five youth league games in my basketball coaching career; perhaps I shouldn’t criticize a guy coaching in the NCAA tournament.

That little fracas between New Orleans players was something else, though. wasn’t it? Props to Slessinger for benching Travan Thibodeaux after he tried to choke his teammate. I guess. I mean, that’s terrible, you have to keep control of your team, build a certain culture within the program, etc. But you also just lost a tournament game by one point and left a kid who had been balling pretty well on the bench for the last stretch of the game. Not sure all his players or folks around the program are going to be good with Slessinger’s decision this morning.


The nightcap, Kansas State vs. Wake Forest, had all my attention. A Big 12 team vs one of the two best players to ever play for KU. I thoroughly approved of all the Danny & The Miracles references throughout the game.

Unfortunately, my man D. Manning got thoroughly out-coached by Bruce Weber. The Wake Forest kids didn’t show any interest at all on the defensive end of the court. Meanwhile K-State was usually locked in and made a number of terrific plays at the rim to keep Wake from scoring. I guess the only real surprise of the night was that the game was even close. K-State shot something like 93% from the field.[1] They weren’t able to really pull away until the final 2:00 or so.

Here’s the thing about K-State: I really like they way they play when they are clicking. They have some really nice parts. They have a handful of guys who are getting everything out of their ability. They often look really well coached.

That last one is the rub. Bruce Weber is a whiny, petty martyr who is probably my second least favorite coach in the Big 12.[2] He needs to get over the fact that he’s not Bill Self or Lon Kruger or whoever he’s complaining about getting more love than him this week. He needs to realize he’s coaching in a power 5 conference, does a pretty good job of it, and stop worrying about whether he’s liked or appreciated as much as his contemporaries. That garbage over the weekend from one of the K-State players about the Wildcats being “the most hated team in college basketball” is classic Weber paranoia. I’m pretty sure there are at least 50 schools more hated that K-State. I’m not saying I would like Weber and K-State if he could shut the fuck up for awhile, but I would respect them a lot more than I do now.

A quick aside, I have a friend here who knows Weber a little from when they were both at Purdue. Recently, without any prompting on my part, he asked, “Isn’t Weber just the worst?”


I learned yesterday that one of C’s classmates has an older brother who is a starting guard for Princeton. Her class recorded a good luck video yesterday that they’re sending his way before their game with Notre Dame. After school she told me the older brother was a “thrower” and one of the “25 best ones in the whole country.” Not really sure what a thrower is in basketball, and while he’s a nice player, I doubt he’s one of the 25 best in the tournament. But I liked that she’s interested and even asked me to record the game for her. And I realized comments like hers are exactly what happens when I don’t let the girls watch basketball with me.


KU feelings this morning: we’re either going to make it to Glendale or lose on Sunday. No in-between right now.


  1. Actually 66%. But still!  ↩
  2. OK, maybe he and Scott Drew are tied for #1.  ↩

The Draw

A few weeks back, in the midst of a particularly satisfying KU game, I told the group of friends I text with during the game that if KU won the Big 12 again this season, they should refuse to play in the NCAA tournament and hang a banner for being regular season national champions.

You may laugh, but there is precedent for that. At least the banner part. In 1975 Indiana went undefeated through the regular season, but lost star Kent Benson late in the year to a broken arm. The Hoosiers then fell to Kentucky in the regional finals. But if you go to Assembly Hall, you will see a large banner that notes the undefeated regular season and proclaims IU the “UPI National Champions” for that year.[1] Since KU finished #1 in the final poll of the regular season, they have a legitimate claim to being National Champions, if you follow Indiana logic.

Anyway, my idea was proclaimed awesome by my buddies. Which says something about the scars that March can leave. Here’s a KU team that lost just four games this season – two of them in overtime – but we’re so afraid of what can happen when you play on a neutral court without the safety net of another game in a few days that we’re ready to chuck the whole tournament.

I’m not thrilled with KU’s draw, but it could be worse. I think Louisville is a very tough 2-seed, but I’ve also seen them look awful at times this year. I’d rather have them than Duke, though. Purdue is one of the teams I wanted to avoid because of Biggie Swanigan and all their size. But the Boilers have often played below their ceiling this year, and they have to beat a red-hot Iowa State team to get to Kansas City anyway. I think it’s kind of garbage that KU might have to play a Big 12 team – the Big 12 tournament champs no less – in the Sweet 16. But I also know KU will be locked in if they get a rematch with the team that ended their home court winning streak last month. Playing the winner of Miami/Michigan State in the round of 32 kind of sucks. That’s probably the toughest 8/9 duo in the tournament, although Wisconsin is the best of all the teams in those two slots and I’m fine missing them. And I don’t understand how Louisville got a much easier path to the Elite 8 than KU did.

But here’s the opinion I’ve come to in recent years: there is no logic to how the brackets get drawn up. Factors that were important one year are forgotten the next. Teams are shifted around at the committee’s whim, sometimes clearly to make interesting matchups rather than to make the best bracket.

I’m starting to come around to the idea that the tournament should be seeded 1–68 and then those teams bracketed based on those seedings alone. Forget location for everyone but the top four teams. Forget conference affiliation. That would seem to make for the fairest bracket, where the current system always seems to create one bracket of death and one that 80% of fans scream about being too easy.[2]

Regardless of what information went into each decision, all you can do is play who is in front of you. And you can’t worry about teams on the opposite side of the bracket until you’ve won a game or two or three. KU’s going to have to beat a good team just to get back to Kansas City for the Sweet 16. Then they’ll have to beat another good team to potentially face a Louisville team that seems designed to give this year’s KU team fits.

Another part of that wanting to skip the NCAA tournament idea was that I’ve loved watching this year’s KU team so much. BIFM became one of my all-time favorites. Josh Jackson is the best freshman to ever play for KU. Landen Lucas has done so much to keep the team afloat. Through injuries and off-the-court issues and recruiting misses that created a couple holes in the roster, this team just kept winning – usually in dramatic fashion – from the second Tuesday in November through the first Saturday of March. But I really, really want them to have three more weeks of basketball in them. Probably more than any KU team in recent memory, I don’t want to say goodbye to this one. The year-end losses always suck and stay with me. But if this team loses before Glendale, it’s going to take even longer for me to get past it.

So I keep telling myself they answered every call this year. They played a tough schedule, and in one of the toughest conferences in the country, and came out with just four losses. What happened last year in Louisville, or the year before in Omaha, or back in 2011 in San Antonio, means nothing to this team’s prospects.

My first-glance Final Four is KU, Carolina, Arizona, Duke. But I will likely amend that before I turn in my pool picks Thursday morning.

Now excuse me while I start pounding various stomach soothing medicines.

Rock Chalk, bitches.


  1. I love the irony of all the Bobby Knight worshipping IU fans of a certain age who probably rail against “particiaption trophies” their grandkids get while not objecting to that banner.  ↩
  2. Hello West Region.  ↩

Friday Playlist

Yesterday was the 30th anniversary of the release of U2’s The Joshua Tree. I remember buying the cassette shortly after it came out, but I either got a bad copy or let it sit in the sun or my tape player mangled it, because within a couple plays it began sounding terrible. As I was five months from getting my drivers license, I couldn’t just run back to Musicland – or whatever relic of the 80s I purchased it at – and swap it out for a new copy. In fact, it was another year or two before I finally replaced it, so my history with the album was delayed a bit. I heard all the massive singles – when I think of the spring of ’87, those first three songs of side one are prominent memories – but didn’t really learn about all the excellent songs on side two for some time.

I went through the obligatory U2 Phase in college, mostly in the winter of ’93 as I recall. That’s when I purchased every album in their catalog, spun them on high repeat around the house, and had a tape of my favorites to listen to in the car. I was deeply into The Joshua Tree at the time, and likely would have called it my favorite U2 album.

Fast forward nearly a quarter century and I rarely listen to U2 anymore. I gave up on their new music when it became nearly impossible to distinguish between their songs and Coldplay’s.1 And the old songs meant less to me than they used to, so spins of the classics became less frequent, too. Once a year or so I’ll put on The Joshua Tree or Achtung Baby and listen all the way through. But when a U2 song pops up on the radio, I’ll often search for something newer and more interesting to me.

I still think Achtung Baby is a slightly better album, mostly because The Joshua Tree was evolutionary – the perfection of the early U2 sound – and Achtung was revolutionary – tearing it all up and trying on new things and having it work amazingly well. But I’ll admit, for all my indifference to U2 these days, spinning The Joshua Tree yesterday was a very, very nice hour or so. Much like The Bends and OK Computer, I think I’ll call these my 1A and 1B U2 albums.

For today’s playlist, a couple Joshua Tree songs, a couple from Son Volt, and another very fine tune.

“Running To Stand Still” – U2. One of the greatest songs in their catalog.

“Colour Of Water” – Rose Elinor Dougall. A very Irish name, although she’s officially listed as English on wikipedia. This is a lovely song.

“Sinking Down” – Son Volt. Son Volt has been all over the map through the years. Sometimes Jay Farrar is completely locked in and his albums are perfect. Other times he drifts a little and I’ve not been interested in his output. I’ll admit I was surprised when I listened to their new album Notes of Blue. It stacks up well with their best work, which is quite an achievement for a band that’s been around for over 20 years now. This scorcher is one of the album’s strongest tracks.

“Windfall” – Son Volt. Son Volt’s 1995 debut album Trace remains the countriest album I’ve ever loved. The lead single, “Drown”, fit nicely into mid-90s alt-rock radio. But the rest of the album had a serious twang to it. But I remember driving home from my second-shift job one night, hearing the band on Rockline, and them playing this song live in the studio. As I was driving across eastern Kansas after the sun had set, I was in a perfect place to hear it. I listened to the whole album the other night and it holds up really, really well.

“Red Hill Mining Town” – U2. I did not know until reading this article yesterday that the band made a video for this song. Seriously, side two of Joshua Tree is just so damn good.


  1. Coincidentally I gave up on Coldplay at the same time. As I’ve often said, Frightened Rabbit sounds like what Coldplay could have sounded like, had they not been interested in becoming the next U2. 

Reader’s Notebook & Thoughts On Travel

A slightly different format for this edition.

But first, a note about my first abandoned book of the year. Boris Fishman’s Don’t Let My Baby Do Rodeo was on several Best Of lists for 2016, and thus was added to my To Read list. Somewhere along the line, I think I got the wrong idea what it was about. I starting reading it expecting a funny view on life in America from the perspective of Russian immigrants. The immigrant angle was correct, but I was way off on the funny angle. Which isn’t to say it wasn’t good. But when you’re expecting something different, it can be tough to plow through. I lasted about 150 pages but then gave up.


Falling Off the Map – Pico Iyer
Kingdoms In The Air – Bob Shacochis
Sandwiched around Rodeo were these two travel books. Iyer wrote his in 1993, and it was based on his travels through several “lonely lands” in the final years of the Cold War. He traveled to countries that were isolated from the rest of the world, whether because of politics, distance, or history, to discover why those countries were different and how the people lived there felt about the gaps between them and the rest of the world. Shacochis’ book is new, but it pulls in essays about travel that span his entire, 40-year writing career. They are more centered on his interactions with the people he’s traveled with, some of whom became great, life-long friends. Both books are fine reads.

As I read both books, I thought about my love for writing about foreign lands. Whether straight history, or more travel-related texts like these, I have always been deeply interested in learning about other locations and cultures. When I was a kid I would devour all international news, was obsessed with maps, and even had a shortwave radio on which I listened to broadcasts from around the globe. Then there’s my interest in languages. I loved Spanish and Italian. I struggled through roughly two months of Russian as a college freshman and dropped it with relief with the Berlin Wall fell. Still, I was fascinated at the idea of learning it. And then there were the classes I took in college: if there was an offering about international politics and relations, the history of other countries, or any other study of non-American things, I was down for it.

And, yet, I’ve never really travelled. I’ve been to resorts in Mexico and the Caribbean a few times. But I’ve never gone to Europe, South America, Australia, or even Canada. Which seems weird for a guy so interested in learning about other places. I can kick ass at trivia games, but have never actually checked out London, Paris, Rome, etc.

My best explanation is that my family simply didn’t travel. My grandparents stayed in their little towns in Kansas, so my parents never took summer trips abroad. If they had dreams of traveling in college, those were dashed when I came along in the summer after my mom’s sophomore year. From then until the mid–80s, there was never the money to travel. Our trips were to central Kansas to visit the grandparents, aunts, and uncles. Even after my mom married my stepdad, and the finances improved, we stayed close to home. They would take weekend trips to hike at parks in Kansas and Missouri.

While I was in college, I toyed with the idea of spending a semester in both Costa Rica and Italy. Each time I mentioned the idea, it was met with skepticism by my parents. Granted, if I wouldn’t have been so erratic academically they might have greeted my request with more enthusiasm. But, despite them being fairly comfortable financially, they were also still recovering from the two years my stepdad didn’t work because he was fighting cancer. The day-to-day expenses were covered, but there was no savings left that could finance their kid to spend three months in another country.

I counter all that with my wife’s family. Her parents both travelled extensively before they got married. Her mom taught in Europe. Her dad was in the Peace Corps. Because they had a huge family together, there were no real family trips for them, either. But traveling was in the blood, and each of the kids traveled either during or immediately after college. One spent a year in Spain in college. Two of my in-laws did the Semester at Sea program as undergrads. One sister-in-law has built her career around traveling all over the globe. A brother-in-law married a woman who was born and raised in Kuwait, so they head to the Middle East fairly regularly.

So far in our girls’ lives we’ve traveled a fair amount around the US. They’ve been to Boston 2–3 times each, South Carolina, Florida, Alabama, Colorado, and Kansas City. Yes, these are always fun/family trips, but I think we’ve built into them the expectation and desire to always be thinking about what your next trip is. I’m interested to see whether and how that blossoms in them when they get older. Will they want to travel through Europe, spend a semester in another country, or do Semester at Sea? Will they be content to travel to domestic cities and national parks? Or will they be like their dad and stay close to home?

As S and I approach our 15th anniversary[1] we’ve started thinking about what trip we should take to celebrate. Should it be a family trip, or just us? Should we go to a beach somewhere and just relax, or pick a part of Europe to explore? As much as I love spending time with the sand and surf, I’m thinking that might be the year that I finally have to put my passport to use somewhere that’s more than a couple hours away from the US border.


A Handful of Dust – David Plowden
I’m constantly reading books about photography, since that’s my current obsession.[2] Normally I won’t include them here, since I doubt they’re of much interest to you – especially the more technical ones. But this one seems to fit the theme of this post. Plowden spent most of his career photographing small, Midwestern towns. In this collection, he revisited towns he photographed in the 70s and 80s to document how they’ve begun to disappear. It’s a gorgeous record of how places like those where my parents grew up, and where I spent my summers as a kid, are slowly receding into the native, prairie grounds. It also makes me think this is a kind of travel I could easily do. There are plenty of shrinking small towns within driving distance of my house.

A good photography book should inspire. This certainly did that.


  1. Next year, yikes!  ↩
  2. And something I really owe you all a long blog post about.  ↩

Review: Ryan Adams, Prisoner

I’ve had two weeks to soak up the sadness that is Ryan Adams’ new album, Prisoner. Time to share some thoughts.

I wasn’t sure how much I would like this album. It wasn’t that I doubted Adams’ ability to write about the end of his marriage to Mandy Moore: he’s been crafting amazing songs about heartbreak his entire career. No, what worried me was this was an album he had been working on, in one form or another, for nearly two years. As an artist who typically cranks out music as quickly as his muse delivers it, I wondered if this album would be over-thought, the magic of the earliest sessions lost as the edges – both emotionally and musically – got worn down over time.

Well, this album does have a polished feel to it. But that in no way takes away from its overall excellence.

As I listened to and considered it, I kept going back to the most common comparison critics and fans made in the days and weeks before the album’s release: Bruce Springsteen’s 1987 album Tunnel of Love. At the surface, there are a lot of reasons to line those albums up. In 1987 Bruce was approaching 40, coming off the most commercially successful album of his career, and was married to an actress who was about 10 years younger than him. When Adams began writing for this album two years ago, he was 40, coming off the most commercially successful album of his career, and had just announced that his marriage to an actress/singer who was 10 years younger his junior was ending. And Adams’ sound has been locked into a mid–80s vibe, that harkened back to Born in the USA, among others, for a few years now.

Beyond those biographical coincidences, there are certainly some common threads through both albums. Adams mostly stays in that Springsteen/Petty pocket of sound that comes so easily to him. A couple songs you could absolutely pick up and place on Tunnel.

But the more I listened to it, the more I realized while those two albums can be called cousins, there are some rather important differences between them.

On Tunnel, Springsteen turned his sound completely upside down, ditching the E. Street Band and recording much of it on his own, while dialing things back closer to his desolate Nebraska album from the epic feel of Born in the USA.

As I said, Prisoner sounds very much like where Adams has been on his last two albums. Where Tunnel can be stark and jarring, Prisoner often sounds beautiful musically.

More important was where these albums fell in each artists’ lives. Tunnel was revelatory and confessional. To the outside world, Springsteen and Julianne Phillips had a storybook marriage. The songs on that album revealed a broken relationship that failed to satisfy either partner, where at least one was looking elsewhere and, increasingly, thinking about doing more than just looking. There is a sense of a couple sitting down, laying all their sins out on the table, and starting the conversation of “Do we even try to fix this?”

Prisoner, on the other hand, comes two years after Adams’ divorce. The break is done and on the public record, time has passed, and Mandy Moore is now one of the brightest stars on TV. Thus, Prisoner feels more reflective and accepting. Adams is telling us what has happened and how he feels in its aftermath.

Adams said he wrote over 80 songs for Prisoner. I would love to hear the songs that were cut, or the original versions of the songs that did make it. I would imagine those he wrote two years to 18 months ago have a completely different feel than the final versions that were published. I bet there was more anger, hurt, and unedited emotion in those songs.

From that comes my only real disappointment in the album. It’s a little one-notey. Each song is of the same stage in Adams’ grief. And while that stage still has pain, it’s not the searing pain of the earliest days in a breakup. There are very few moments of anger. In fact, the cruelest line I can find on the album comes on my favorite song, “Outbound Train”[1] when he sings

Swear I wasn’t lonely when I met your girl
I was just so bored, I was so bored…

When it comes to sick, breakup burns put to wax, that ranks pretty low.

He’s sad, he’s lonely, but the pain feels weathered and familiar rather than fresh and raw, and there are also no glimmers of hope that he and his lost love can repair things.

That one quibble aside, I still love listening to the album. As I said, some of the songs are profoundly pretty. It’s a classic grower, that keeps burrowing into your head a little more on each listen. There isn’t a song as great as “Brilliant Disguise” on it, but there’s also not a single song I skip past where Tunnel has several I have no interest in listening to.

In addition to Tunnel of Love, I keep thinking of two other great breakup albums, both of which just happen to be in my top 20 albums ever: Frightened Rabbit’s The Midnight Organ Fight and the War on Drugs’ Lost In The Dream.

Midnight is all piss and anger and sticking your finger in the wound to make sure you still feel the pain. Lost in the Dream feels like the sigh when you’re just rising out of that stage, coming to terms with the pain and loss, and beginning to realize that you need to find a path out of it.

Prisoner is another step down that path. The pain isn’t completely gone, but it has eased. And the dominant emotion is of being lonely rather than devastated.

A near perfect – but deeply depressing – soundtrack to the end of a relationship would begin with Tunnel of Love, careen into The Midnight Organ Fight, stumble through Lost in the Dream, and finally resolve in Prisoner.

Rating Ryan Adams albums is always difficult, partially because of the quantity of his output over the years, partially because he shifts sounds so often, partially because of the expectations of his talent. I don’t know that Prisoner is his best album. But I think it is an honest and accurate representation of the artist he has become: one of our finest chroniclers of love and loss.


  1. Holy Springsteen-esque title!  ↩

Friday Vid

“French Press” – Rolling Blackouts Coastal Fever.
I know, this was in a playlist exactly one month ago today. But it’s been an odd music week for me,[1] and this video just dropped. It makes me want to be in my 20s and go to a casual wedding hosted at a pool in Australia. Until it gets a little melancholy at the end.


  1. Long story short, my vehicle has been with the dealer all week awaiting a replacement part, so I’ve not had SiriusXM to listen to, nor the Ryan Adams CD I left in the player. And there weren’t any great new releases last Friday. All that combined to make it a rather stagnant music week for me.  ↩

No Conference Love

I’ve been pimping Mark Titus’ work for several years, first when he was with Grantland and now that he and many Grantlanders have resurfaced at The Ringer. Even on the rare day when I’m not super interested in the subject of his articles, I’ll at least skim them.

That was the case with his piece last week about the woeful state of Big 10 basketball. And I’m glad I skimmed it, because there were two fantastic nuggets in it.

If either Indiana or Purdue was playing when I was growing up, my ass was in front of a TV watching. And if those teams weren’t playing, my ass was still in front of a TV, probably watching some other Big Ten game.

Yes!

Man do I love the ubiquity of college basketball on cable TV these days. There’s the ESPN tier of channels. There are the two national Fox sports networks. The regional FSNs. The Big 10 Network. And the NBC and CBS sports networks. Some nights I can choose from an many as ten games at a time to find a good one to watch. On weekends CBS, Fox, and a couple local channels add even more options. And if, on rare occasions, a game isn’t on a national feed, I can usually find it on the Watch ESPN app. Football might be king, but you can’t complain about how much airtime is devoted to college basketball games.

But as I read that passage in Titus’ piece, it made me think back to my childhood, when my ass was in front of the TV watching Big 8 basketball. When I was really young, I remember the Big 8 network[1] sometimes showing just one game every Saturday. Other times they would have a double-header, but even then half the teams in the conference did not have their games televised. If KU wasn’t picked that weekend, I turned the TV volume down, pulled my radio next to me, and listened to the KU game while I watched Colorado and Oklahoma play. The national networks would often carry a game each afternoon, but that was it. You had to wait for the 10 o’clock news or the Sunday sports page to find out how teams around the country did.

I’m not arguing things were better then. They are way better today. But I wonder if we didn’t have a little more love for our home teams back then. You see more IU, Purdue, and Butler gear on kids than any other school around here. But there are still a lot of kids who are rocking Kentucky, Duke, and Carolina gear. And I bet that number is way higher that it was 30 years ago. If a kid in Indianapolis or Kansas City was a Duke fan 30 years ago, it was likely because someone in his family went there. Now it’s because he’s seen Duke twice a week his entire life. The broader reach of college basketball has weakened the lure that the home team has on kids.

Then there was this line:

I can’t think of anything that’s dumber in college sports than conference pride…Just cheer for your own team, and when it gets eliminated from national title contention, try behaving like a normal human being would: Hope that every gym in the country is burned to the ground before a champion can be crowned.

Exactly!

Even if the conference doing well independently of KU makes the Jayhawks’ dominance of the conference look better, I still want every Big 12 team losing one round before KU does. I didn’t get all warm and fuzzy when Oklahoma made it to the Final Four last year. I was depressed that KU came up one game short. If KU goes out of the tournament and I decide to keep watching games, I’m not jumping on the bandwagon of the Big 12 teams that are still alive. I’ll wish them luck, but I’m not getting all worked up about them winning and yelling “BIG TWELVE FOOLSSSSSS!” at Big 10 fans around the neighborhood.

Besides, Titus is right. I’m more focused on making sure basketball as we know it ends a fiery death than spending time hoping that Iowa State carries the Big 12 banner well.


  1. “Hello everybody, along with former Big 8 All-American Gary Thompson, I’m Jay Randolph.”  ↩
Newer posts »

© 2024 D's Notebook

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑