Month: May 2009 (Page 2 of 2)

Rumorville

I’m going to act like a typical blogger for a minute and start a rumor based on minimal evidence: I think there’s a culture of acceptance of the use of performance enhancing drugs at ESPN.

I’m not talking about glossing over the use of PEDs by athletes. I’m talking about their on-air talent. Two in particular. Hannah Storm and Sage Steele.*

(That would be Carmel High School and Indiana University alum Sage Steele. Although apparently Ms. Steele was not a big fan of her time in Carmel. Fire up the Google if you want the story.)

I’ve noticed they both go sleeveless a lot and both are completely ripped, at least in the shoulders and upper arms. Two women with muscular arms on one network? There must be something untoward going on in Bristol!

Also, would it kill either woman to eat a cheeseburger on occasion? I have three daughters and they need to learn that it’s ok not to have your ribs showing.

 

R’s – Streaking

This is starting to get weird.  I’m not sure what to do when I look at the standings and see the Royals, winners of six straight games, sitting in first place, seven games over .500, with a three game lead.  I know, I know, it’s not even mid-May yet.  The 2003 Royals had a seven game lead in July and only eeked out 83 wins.  But still, the vibe seems to be changing around this team.

Nothing made that more apparent than last weekend’s series in Minnesota.  That was the place where strange things always happened to make sure the Royals lost.  On the rare occasion when they held a late lead in the Metrodome, something crazy would happen in the 8th or 9th and the Twins would snatch the win away.  But last weekend it was the opposite.  The Royals got the breaks Saturday, in a sloppy game that no one seemed to want to win.  And Sunday, after getting no-hit for six innings, they jumped all over the Twins in the final three innings.  That stuff is not supposed to happen.

Follow that up with another extra-inning win, this time over the White Sox, and then a come-from-way-behinder to sweep the Sox and two wins against the Mariners, and suddenly we’re looking at the hottest team in baseball.

Whew.

As I said, it’s a little hard to take in.  This is a team that I’ve hated, ignored, disdained, followed casually, and slowly learned to at least like again since the 1994 strike.  If there has been a constant, it’s that they will lose.  If they’re ahead late, they’ll blow it.  If they get down a few runs early, you might as well watch something else, because they’re not coming back.

It would seem that a shift in expectations is in order for us fans.  This is a team that is proving itself to be difficult to beat.  Those old in-game markers that predicted the final outcome are becoming less valid.  No longer can I pull up their score while running errands, see that they’re down a couple runs in the third and figure the game is pretty much over.  Now the fun is just starting when they fall behind.

Here’s an example of how my expectations and attitude towards the team is changing: Thursday I’m listening to the game while the baby takes a nap on me.  The Royals score a run in the third on a two-out double, a stolen base, and an error.  One run with six innings to play.  I had a strange sense of confidence that the game was over.  Even back when Jose Rosado was dealing, I don’t remember having that kind of confidence.

Times are definitely changing.


A couple other things.

I loved the look on Zack Greinke’s face as he closed out his complete game shut-out on Monday.  He was grinning broadly and it was as if he too couldn’t believe this early season craziness.  It was also comforting for a guy who’s been through so much.  If he’s getting that much joy out of the game, we can hope he’s going to continue to be as nasty as he’s been through his first six starts.

If you were like me and you watched Monday’s game on the Royals’ network, you saw the bizarre interview between the network’s sideline reporter and “Guy Fieri” of the Food Network.  I put his name in quotes because it turns out it wasn’t him but rather someone who apparently presented himself as Mr. Fieri.  While I was watching, I kept thinking, “What a dick.”  I guess if I watched Fieri’s shows more often, I would have quickly realized it wasn’t him.  The real Guy <a href=”http://twitter.com/ChefGuyFieri” target=”_blank”>set the record straight</a>.

<a href=”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IS56zhhqtYk”>Guy Fieri Imposter At The K</a>

 

A Toy I Won’t Buy

My long time readers know there are a few subjects that are always sure to interest me. When you combine two of those, like say peanut butter and chocolate, watch out.

So why don’t I own a Kindle? It’s a cool tech toy, and I do love me some tech toys.* And it’s for reading, which I need to do like breathing in order to function properly. Seems like a no brainer, right?

(Here’s a little something I’ve never shared. The majority of the money I make in my professional life goes into what S. calls my Computer Fund. Keep in mind I work only sporadically and I don’t make much when I am working. But still, that account pays for my monthly iPhone bill and allows me to make an impulse purchase every few months from the Apple Store, Amazon, etc. that ends with me unwrapping something that has a microprocessor in it.)

Amazon announced the new Kindle DX on Wednesday and it did not have me reaching for my credit card. Don’t get me wrong, it looks terribly cool. I’ve talked to some people who own a Kindle and think it’s great. I love the idea of having what amounts to a reading version of an iPod – a device that is loaded with all kinds of content so I can call up whatever fits my mood – with me everywhere I go.

But there is a fatal flaw that keeps me from placing an order: you have to purchase all the content.* Until there is some kind of “library” option, meaning a way to legally borrow content, I can’t see myself buying one.

(The Kindle will load some content that is free. However the bulk of what I would want to read on it I would have to pay for.)

It’s not that I expect a Kindle Library service to be like going to my public library, where I get the majority of my books. There’s no way Amazon, Sprint, and the publishing world would allow free access to every book ever printer under their current pricing scheme.

I’m willing to pay a small fee, a buck for a week or ten days, after which I’ll either have to drop another buck or the book disappears from my virtual library. But since I read 30-40-50 books a year, I would have a hard time justifying paying $10 a pop when I could go pick the same book up for free at the library.* Another option is a flat fee for monthly access. Charge me $20 to read five books, three magazines, and two newspapers. Tier out a plan that provides more access for more money, and I’m getting more interested.

(Free as in my tax dollars magically help fund the library.)

I like the concept of the Kindle, and we’re certainly headed towards a time when some Kindle-like device will be the way we read content currently found in books, magazines, and newspapers. The trick for global adoption will be finding the sweet spot in the pricing of such a device that fits the needs of both the users and the content providers. Both sides of that equation are going to have to make changes to their expectations of the relationship. I’m anxiously awaiting the day when someone finds that perfect middle point.

 

Newer posts »

© 2024 D's Notebook

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑